Opinion Pieces
Apr. 3rd, 2010 02:15 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Sign in Florida doctor's office tells those who voted for Obama to go elsewhere.
Apparently, this kind of thing is legal, if barely. It seems that the anti-discrimination laws deal with race, gender, faith and orientation, not political opinion. It's a fine line, but one that this arsehole is walking with apparent glee. Now, maybe it's just me, but I personally don't think that anyone in a position of that kind of authority should be allowed to go around suggesting that someone's not welcome or wrong if they don't share said professional's political or religious opinions. I'm not against anyone having opinions, mind you - I just honestly think that if you're in the workplace, you keep those opinions to yourself.
And yes, this goes for pharmacists and even doctors who will stonewall anyone seeking the morning-after pill, contraception or even abortion. I am not saying that any doctor who does not believe in or approve of abortion should be forced to perform them; gods no. However, any doctor who is asked for advice on such should at least have the professionalism to say, "This goes against everything I stand for; I will refer you to [OtherDoctor] if you're serious about this". As to pharmacists refusing to provide the Pill, morning-after or otherwise, I would only say that if one is not willing to fill a prescription, one should not be a pharmacist.
I sort of worry, in this sort of situation, about people who apparently deliberately put themselves in a position where they could enforce their beliefs on the general public in a professional setting. It's bad enough when it's doctors - what happens when it's policemen? Or teachers? What happened to professional detachment?
Apparently, this kind of thing is legal, if barely. It seems that the anti-discrimination laws deal with race, gender, faith and orientation, not political opinion. It's a fine line, but one that this arsehole is walking with apparent glee. Now, maybe it's just me, but I personally don't think that anyone in a position of that kind of authority should be allowed to go around suggesting that someone's not welcome or wrong if they don't share said professional's political or religious opinions. I'm not against anyone having opinions, mind you - I just honestly think that if you're in the workplace, you keep those opinions to yourself.
And yes, this goes for pharmacists and even doctors who will stonewall anyone seeking the morning-after pill, contraception or even abortion. I am not saying that any doctor who does not believe in or approve of abortion should be forced to perform them; gods no. However, any doctor who is asked for advice on such should at least have the professionalism to say, "This goes against everything I stand for; I will refer you to [OtherDoctor] if you're serious about this". As to pharmacists refusing to provide the Pill, morning-after or otherwise, I would only say that if one is not willing to fill a prescription, one should not be a pharmacist.
I sort of worry, in this sort of situation, about people who apparently deliberately put themselves in a position where they could enforce their beliefs on the general public in a professional setting. It's bad enough when it's doctors - what happens when it's policemen? Or teachers? What happened to professional detachment?
no subject
Date: 2010-04-03 02:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-03 03:29 pm (UTC)I stand ready to be corrected here, but as I understand the medical profession in the States, this fuckwit is simply shooting himself in the foot. After all, if he is paid per patient, and he's telling patients to go elsewhere, he's deliberately reducing his potential earnings. Or doesn't he like the idea of some of his tax dollars coming back to him?
no subject
Date: 2010-04-03 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-03 11:52 pm (UTC)