Theatre Reviews
Mar. 7th, 2007 12:01 amAfter Day of Eternal Torture at work, I was taken to see Equus by
dodgyhoodoo as the last bit of my birthday present. I was tired and a bit depressed, but was looking very much forward to it all the same. I was very keen to see how Daniel Radcliffe did in a serious role and how he and Richard Griffiths worked together after their work on the Harry Potter series.
Then we got into the theatre and saw a sign that said, "Due to illness, Richard Griffiths is unable to perform this evening". Bum. So we got Colin Haigh for the psychiatrist instead. Haigh generally plays a character who's only in two scenes, but also understudies the psychiatrist. I was more than happy to give this guy a shot, but on the whole, he left me utterly cold. So many fantastic lines, and not a shred of emoting. It was depressing overall, at least in that respect. I will give him props for managing as well as he did lines-wise on only two days' rehearsal (he only fluffed a few), but if he's the understudy ... surely he shouldn't have to have learned the lines in two days - he should have been learning them in rehearsals ... right? I mean, that's what I did when I understudied, and I was in amateur crap. I'm confused.
Daniel Radcliffe can act. The set was beautifully done, even if converting a proscenium arch into a theatre-in-the-round was probably a bad idea due to audience members on the 'jury bench' upstage hanging their arms over the railing and causing a bit of a distraction. On the whole, the play was great. My only complaint was Haigh, whose lack of oomph in line delivery meant that he never held my interest. Everyone stole the show from him - the parents, the magistrate, the love interest, the horses ... and, when he was alone onstage, the set itself had more presence and ability to captivate, even when it was just four square boxes and some shut stable doors.
I could go into my whole theatre studies spiel, but it's late so I won't do that just now. What I will say is that it would have been completely perfect if Richard Griffiths hadn't got sick, or if Colin Haigh hadn't been phoning in his lines. As it was, it was occasionally distracting watching the other actors trying to get Haigh to engage with them as characterisation and script demanded and, on the whole, was a bit of a let-down. Which is a pity, but not really anybody's fault. Except possibly for Haigh's. Git.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Then we got into the theatre and saw a sign that said, "Due to illness, Richard Griffiths is unable to perform this evening". Bum. So we got Colin Haigh for the psychiatrist instead. Haigh generally plays a character who's only in two scenes, but also understudies the psychiatrist. I was more than happy to give this guy a shot, but on the whole, he left me utterly cold. So many fantastic lines, and not a shred of emoting. It was depressing overall, at least in that respect. I will give him props for managing as well as he did lines-wise on only two days' rehearsal (he only fluffed a few), but if he's the understudy ... surely he shouldn't have to have learned the lines in two days - he should have been learning them in rehearsals ... right? I mean, that's what I did when I understudied, and I was in amateur crap. I'm confused.
Daniel Radcliffe can act. The set was beautifully done, even if converting a proscenium arch into a theatre-in-the-round was probably a bad idea due to audience members on the 'jury bench' upstage hanging their arms over the railing and causing a bit of a distraction. On the whole, the play was great. My only complaint was Haigh, whose lack of oomph in line delivery meant that he never held my interest. Everyone stole the show from him - the parents, the magistrate, the love interest, the horses ... and, when he was alone onstage, the set itself had more presence and ability to captivate, even when it was just four square boxes and some shut stable doors.
I could go into my whole theatre studies spiel, but it's late so I won't do that just now. What I will say is that it would have been completely perfect if Richard Griffiths hadn't got sick, or if Colin Haigh hadn't been phoning in his lines. As it was, it was occasionally distracting watching the other actors trying to get Haigh to engage with them as characterisation and script demanded and, on the whole, was a bit of a let-down. Which is a pity, but not really anybody's fault. Except possibly for Haigh's. Git.